Centrend

Menu
Facebook Twitter Instagram Linkedin

Author name: admin

Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts. Animated, storybook-style illustration of a modern manufacturing floor inside an IT-controlled facility: two professionals in hard hats watch robotic arms and a conveyor line, while an IT operator monitors systems from an office window beside a glowing server rack. Title reads “Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts: Stop Ransomware, Cut Downtime,” with a humorous quote at the bottom.

Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts: Stop Ransomware, Cut Downtime

Managed Services /

Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts. Downtime is getting more expensive for Massachusetts manufacturers. One ransomware hit, one failed patch, or one remote access mistake can stop scheduling, slow shipping, and create a backlog that takes weeks to unwind. Many SMB manufacturers still rely on “fix it when it breaks” IT, and that approach does not hold up when production depends on always-on systems. When production stalls, the costs stack fast. Not just in IT hours, but in missed ship dates, rush freight, overtime, and customer pressure. Most teams do not feel the risk day to day, until one small event turns into a full stop. This article is for Massachusetts manufacturing decision makers, owners, GMs, and operations leaders who want fewer surprises and more uptime. You will learn what a manufacturing-focused MSP should put in place to reduce ransomware risk and shorten downtime when something goes wrong. Why ransomware hurts manufacturers differently Attackers aim for maximum disruption, because disruption forces decisions. Manufacturing is a prime target because downtime is expensive and recovery can be complex. Common choke points they exploit: One weak link can spread quickly across shared drives, production support systems, and core business operations. What “good” looks like: the uptime stack A strong MSP does not just “support IT.” They build a system that makes attacks harder, contains damage faster, and restores operations with less chaos. Here is the uptime stack to look for. 1) Identity locked down (where most breaches start) If attackers cannot take over accounts, they cannot move freely. Minimum standards: Decision maker check: If one user gets phished today, can that account touch finance files, production docs, and admin tools? If yes, you are exposed. 2) Patch management that runs on a schedule Most ransomware uses known holes. The window between “fix available” and “fix applied” is where trouble lives. A real patch program includes: Decision maker check: Can you see a simple report that shows patch compliance across all devices in under 2 minutes? 3) Segmentation that limits blast radius If office IT and production support systems share the same easy pathways, one infection spreads fast. Segmentation basics: Decision maker check: If a sales laptop is compromised, can it reach production-related systems? If you are unsure, assume yes. 4) Backups that are isolated and tested Backups are only useful if they restore quickly and cleanly. What “backup-ready” means: Decision maker check: When was your last successful restore test, and how long did it take to get critical operations back? 5) Monitoring that catches threats early The earlier you detect, the less downtime you suffer. Many incidents show warning signs before encryption starts. Look for: Decision maker check: If an attacker signs in from a risky location at 2 AM, who gets alerted, and what happens next? The downtime reduction plan (simple, practical steps) Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts. If you want fast improvement without a huge overhaul, start here. 1: Close the easy doors (7–14 days) 2: Build stability (30 days) 3: Reduce blast radius (60–90 days) What to ask before hiring a Manufacturing MSP in Massachusetts Use these questions in a sales call. A good MSP will answer clearly, not vaguely. Ask: What this helps you achieve This approach is not about fear. It is about control. With the right MSP setup, you get: Next move If you are a Massachusetts SMB manufacturer and downtime would hurt your next 30 days of production, do not wait for a “big event” to force change. Start with a short readiness review focused on: Fixing these areas first is how you stop ransomware from becoming a shutdown and keep production moving. Book your FREE MSP Assessment Call Now!

Manufacturing MSP Massachusetts: Stop Ransomware, Cut Downtime Read More »

AI Agent workflow scene showing a giant AI robot looming over a surprised office worker at a desk, with the text “You’re in my seat!” and a warning theme about stalled growth.

AI Agent Workflow That Stalls Growth

Cybersecurity, Managed Services /

AI Agent Workflow Most teams do not lose momentum because of bad ideas.They lose momentum in the handoff between one AI step and the next. A lead comes in.One agent qualifies it.Outreach drafting comes next.Urgency scoring follows.CRM updates close the loop. Everything looks fast on paper.But one missing rule, one unclear trigger, or one skipped check can freeze the whole chain. Not with an error that screams.With silence. That is where teams are testing agentic AI workflows right now:not only for speed, but for control, trust, and decision flow. What teams are testing now 1) Clear decision lanes per agent Teams are assigning each agent a very narrow role: When one agent tries to do too much, outputs become mixed and hard to trust.Focused roles create cleaner handoffs and faster decisions. 2) Guardrail checks between every handoff Instead of checking only at the end, teams are placing small checks in the middle: These micro-checks prevent bad outputs from moving downstream. 3) Confidence-based routing If confidence is high, the workflow continues.If confidence is low, it routes to a person. This keeps work moving without forcing humans into every step. 4) Fallback logic for edge cases Strong teams are planning for exceptions: Without fallback rules, one edge case can hold up ten clean tasks behind it. 5) Audit-friendly logs Teams want to answer one question fast:“Why did the AI choose this?” They are logging: That makes reviews faster and cuts repeat mistakes. Where small guardrail gaps block decisions Small gaps rarely look dangerous in isolation.But in multi-agent flow, they stack. A weak prompt instruction becomes a wrong category.A wrong category becomes a wrong priority.A wrong priority delays a critical follow-up.The delay becomes lost revenue or missed timing. By the time someone sees the impact, the root cause is hidden three steps earlier. That is why leading teams are not only asking,“Can this workflow run?”They are asking,“Can this workflow stay reliable under pressure?” A practical structure teams are using Use this sequence to keep decisions fast and safe: This structure keeps speed without losing judgment. What this means for teams now The next advantage is not just “using AI agents.”It is building decision-safe agent workflows. Fast is easy to demo.Reliable is what scales. AI Agent Workflow is when teams close small guardrail gaps early, they stop invisible delays before they spread.Decisions move with more clarity.People trust the system sooner.And execution becomes consistent, not chaotic. One weak handoff can stall the whole pipeline. Let’s fix it. Book a Call!

AI Agent Workflow That Stalls Growth Read More »

AI Workflow automation illustration showing a robot and a human working side by side in a blue-lit digital office, with glowing screens, server racks, and a resting cat, highlighting fast task execution and team support.

AI Workflow Automation Simplifies Growth for Lean Teams

Cybersecurity, Managed Services /

AI workflow automation, lean teams do not fail because they lack ideas.They fail because too much time goes to repetitive work, slow approvals, and disconnected tools. You start the week with a clear plan. By Friday, you are buried in manual tasks, chasing updates, and rewriting the same message for different channels. Output drops. Quality slips. Growth stalls. That is the real problem. The good news is this: you do not need a big team to scale. You need a smarter workflow. AI workflow automation helps lean teams remove bottlenecks, speed up execution, and focus on the work that actually drives results. The real pain lean teams face Most lean teams deal with the same pressure points: When this repeats every week, growth becomes reactive instead of intentional. Why the old way stops working The old workflow depends on constant human effort for every small step: This model does not scale. It burns people out and makes performance inconsistent. The better path: AI workflow automation AI workflow automation is not about replacing your team.It is about removing repetitive friction so your team can do higher-value work. A practical setup looks like this: That is how lean teams create consistency without adding headcount. What changes after implementation When the workflow is structured correctly, you will see clear improvements: The key shift is simple: stop measuring activity, start measuring outcomes. Not just opens.Clicks, conversions, and pipeline impact. A simple rollout for lean teams You do not need a huge launch. Start small and build confidence. Small consistent steps create scalable systems. Final takeaway Lean teams grow faster when they stop doing everything manually.AI workflow automation gives structure, speed, and focus, so you can produce better marketing with less strain and stronger results. If growth matters, simplify the workflow first.Everything else gets easier after that. Turn cybersecurity tips into real results, Schedule a Strategy Call Today!

AI Workflow Automation Simplifies Growth for Lean Teams Read More »

Illustration showing secure remote access as a protected modern IT office, with servers and glowing blue security barriers pushing unauthorized users away.

Keep Outsiders Out: Remote Access Built to Last

Cybersecurity, Managed Services /

Keep Outsiders Out is not a slogan. It is a daily requirement for any team that works remote, uses cloud apps, or touches controlled data. Because today, the “front door” to your business is not your office lobby.It is your login screen. And when remote access is loose, attackers do not need to break in.They simply sign in. At Centrend, we help organizations tighten remote access the right way. No drama. No slowdowns. Just clean controls that protect your team and support compliance, including CMMC Level 2 expectations. Remote access is where most teams get exposed Most security plans sound strong until someone is working from a hotel Wi-Fi, a personal device, or a rushed “quick login” at night. That is when gaps show up like: Remote work is normal now. That means remote access must be built like a core system, not an afterthought. The remote access controls that actually keep outsiders out Here are the controls that make the biggest difference, without making work miserable. 1) Strong MFA that is not easy to trick Basic MFA is better than nothing, but attackers have learned how to push people into approving logins. Better options include: If your users can approve a login without thinking, an attacker can win with one well-timed push. 2) Least privilege access Keep outsiders out. A login should not equal full access. Strong remote access uses: This limits damage even if a credential is compromised. 3) Device checks before access is granted If a device is outdated, unmanaged, or missing protection, it should not touch your systems. Good “device trust” checks include: This keeps personal laptops and risky machines from becoming silent entry points. 4) VPN, ZTNA, and “access paths” that stay reliable Many teams still rely on one remote access path and hope it never breaks. But outages happen. Provider issues happen. Configuration mistakes happen. Resilient setups include: When access is designed this way, a “bad internet day” becomes a detour, not a shutdown. 5) Logging that proves what happened For compliance and real-world response, logs matter so keep outsiders out. Your remote access trail should answer: This is where many teams fail audits. Not because they are unsafe, but because they cannot prove they are safe. The CMMC angle: remote access needs to be defendable If you are in the DoD supply chain, remote access is not just an IT decision.It is part of your ability to stay eligible. Strong access controls support areas CMMC assessors expect to see in practice, like: Remote access should not only “work.”It should hold up during a real review and during a real incident. Quick checklist: is your remote access actually strong? If you can answer “yes” to most of these, you are in a good place: If several of these are “not sure,” that is your signal. How Centrend helps Centrend helps teams secure remote access without slowing everyone down. We support you with: It is not about adding tools.It is about building a remote access setup that stays solid all year. Keep outsiders out, and keep work moving Remote work will always be remote.The difference is whether your access is tight, calm, and proven. If you want a simple outside review of your remote access controls, Centrend can run a short Remote Access Controls Check and leave you with a clear action list. Book a Remote Access Security Check with Centrend → BookYourRemoteITCheck FAQ What are remote access controls? Remote access controls are the security rules that decide who can sign in, from what device, and what they are allowed to reach after login. Does CMMC Level 2 require MFA? CMMC Level 2 aligns with NIST SP 800-171 practices, which include multi-factor authentication for certain access scenarios and strong access control expectations overall.Source: https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/sp/800-171/rev-2/final What is the biggest remote access risk for small teams? Weak MFA, shared credentials, unmanaged devices, and excessive permissions are the most common issues. Can remote access be secure without making users miserable? Yes. The goal is “secure by default,” with fewer manual steps and fewer risky workarounds.

Keep Outsiders Out: Remote Access Built to Last Read More »

CMMC New Year Compliance graphic showing a digital checklist and contract icons connected in a blue network style scene

CMMC New Year Compliance: The Calm Before The Contract Test

Cybersecurity /

CMMC New Year Compliance January feels quiet. Fewer meetings. A lighter inbox. People easing back in. But defense work does not wait for a clean start. This is the week when primes ask for proof, contracting teams tighten requirements, and your next bid can hinge on one simple question: Can you show your CMMC posture clearly, quickly, and in writing? If your answer is “we’re close” or “our IT vendor said we’re covered,” New Year is when that gap turns into a scramble. The scramble usually looks like this: Your team is chasing screenshots and policiesSomeone realizes SPRS is missing a required postRemote access is messy after holiday travelA single outage or login issue slows work and pushes people into risky workarounds And suddenly the “slow” week becomes the most expensive week of the quarter. What “New Year compliance” actually means in CMMC terms CMMC New Year compliance is not a slogan. It is your ability to start the year with: A clear scope of what systems touch CUI and FCIThe right version of the standard applied the right wayEvidence that matches what an assessor or prime will ask forRemote access that stays secure even when people are travelingResilience when a cloud provider, DNS, VPN, or identity service has a bad day If you want a practical target, aim for this: If someone asked you today for your CMMC Level 2 story, you could share it in one email thread without backtracking. The most common New Year mistake: following the wrong “version” A lot of teams hear “Rev 3 is here” and panic. Here is the clarity that matters: CMMC Level 2 is based on NIST SP 800-171 Revision 2 for assessment and scoring today.NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 exists and is final, but it is not what CMMC Level 2 is scored against right now. So the smart move is not “switch everything to Rev 3 overnight.”The smart move is: Get clean on Rev 2 now, and build a controlled plan to absorb Rev 3 changes without blowing up your program. NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 was published as final on May 14, 2024. The requirement that trips teams up: SPRS and award readiness CMMC New year Compliance is where New Year gets real. Because even if your internal controls are improving, award workflows often depend on what is posted and affirmed. In DoD’s DFARS ecosystem: DFARS 252.204-7025 requires offerors to post the results of a CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 self assessment to SPRS prior to contract award, and identify the information systems that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI. That is not a “later” task. That is a before-award reality in the flow DoD describes. If you want one New Year action that reduces stress fast, do this first: Confirm what is posted in SPRS, confirm it matches your scoped systems, and confirm the affirming official process is understood. The hidden cost of “we’ll handle it later” When teams postpone these checks, the damage usually shows up as: Bid delays because someone cannot verify compliance statusLast minute policy writing that does not match the environmentOver-permissioned remote access because it is easier in the momentUntracked tools used during downtime because people just need to workEvidence gaps that create uncomfortable conversations with primes It is rarely one big failure.It is ten small gaps that collide when the year starts moving fast. The New Year CMMC compliance reset A practical 90 day path that does not overwhelm your team Here is a clean way to run this without chaos. 1) Lock scope before you “fix” anything Write down, in plain terms: Which people, devices, and systems touch CUIWhich systems are in scope for CMMC Level 2Where CUI lives, moves, and is sharedWhich vendors and SaaS tools are part of that path If scope is fuzzy, your controls and your evidence will be fuzzy too. 2) Make Rev 2 your audited baseline Because CMMC Level 2 aligns to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 for scoring today, your January goal is: A complete Rev 2 control map with ownersEvidence tied to each controlA living POA and M plan that is realistic, dated, and owned This is how you avoid “paper compliance” that breaks under real questions. 3) Confirm SPRS readiness before bids heat up Treat SPRS like a New Year gate, not a back-office chore. Verify your posting status and documentation path for CMMC Level 1 or Level 2 self assessment results as described in DFARS workflows. Also confirm your internal list of systems matches what you will identify in award workflows. 4) Harden remote access for the “travel month” reality New Year includes travel, hybrid schedules, and “I’m logging in from somewhere else.” Focus on: Multi factor authentication everywhere it mattersLeast privilege access that matches job rolesDevice checks for managed vs unmanaged endpointsClear offboarding and access review routines This is where a lot of “cheap IT” quietly creates long term risk. 5) Build cloud resilience so outages do not become security incidents Outages happen. The goal is not perfection. The goal is continuity without risky improvisation. Document: Your backup path for DNS and critical servicesWho flips what switch during an outageWhat your team uses if VPN or identity is unstableHow you log and retain incident notes for audit trails When the plan is clear, people do not panic click. 6) Start a calm Rev 3 transition plan Rev 3 is real and it is worth preparing for. But do it like adults: Create a delta list between Rev 2 and Rev 3Prioritize changes that improve security now anywaySchedule updates around business cycles and contract prioritiesAvoid rewrites that erase working evidence You are not starting over. You are maturing. A simple way to measure if you are ready Ask yourself: If a prime requested our CMMC Level 2 posture this week, could we respond in one business day with confidence? If the answer is “maybe,” your New Year task is not more tools.It is clarity, scope, evidence, and

CMMC New Year Compliance: The Calm Before The Contract Test Read More »

Adult streaming site breach warning graphic showing a laptop, data leak icons, and a padlock symbol, highlighting 200 million exposed records.

Adult Streaming Site Breach: 200 Million Records Exposed

Cybersecurity /

Adult Streaming Site Breach. Most people trust that what they watch in private stays between them and the screen. This breach shows how quickly that trust can crack. In December 2025, a criminal group tied to ShinyHunters claimed it pulled about 94 GB of analytics data on more than 200 million premium users from a major adult streaming platform. The data set reportedly includes email addresses, rough locations, viewing history, search terms, video titles, and time stamps. Attackers did not even have to break into the main site. Reports say they slipped in through a third party analytics provider the platform used to track user behavior. Passwords and payment cards may be safe. The viewing and search history is not and on its own it is enough to fuel large scale extortion and long lasting embarrassment for real people. This is not just one adult site’s story. It is a warning shot for any organization that collects behavior data and a serious alert for defense contractors working under strict CMMC requirements as the holiday season stretches staff thin. Why this breach hits harder than “just another leak” Most breaches people hear about involve stolen passwords or card numbers. Those are painful, but fixable. This incident cuts deeper: 1. Behavior data is more personal than card data 2. The weak point was an analytics pipeline News reports say the attackers targeted a data analytics provider, not the main platform itself.  That means: 3. Extortion is built into the business model The group behind the theft is known for stealing large data sets and then demanding payment to keep them private. With a dataset like this: This kind of breach turns trust and reputation into the main casualty in the adult streaming site breach What this means for every company, not just adult sites Even if your organization has nothing to do with adult content, this incident should still make you pause. Think about your own systems: For defense contractors, replace “viewing history” with: If that data leaked through a third party during the holiday season, you could be dealing with: The CMMC connection: holidays, extortion, and supply chain risk CMMC Level 2 is grounded in NIST SP 800-171 and expects you to protect CUI across your entire ecosystem, not just inside your own firewall. The adult streaming breach illustrates three CMMC themes you cannot ignore: This is exactly where Centrend’s CMMC holiday resiliency focus comes in: helping contractors prove that their controls work when it matters most. A simple “Adult Streaming Breach” checklist for your own systems Use this as a short, sharp review with your IT, security, and compliance leads. 1. Map behavior data, not just CUI 2. Trim what you collect and how long you keep it Less data stored means less data to expose. 3. Tighten third-party security expectations For each vendor that holds sensitive logs or CUI related data: If a vendor resists basic security questions, treat that as a risk signal. 4. Prepare for extortion-style incidents The streaming breach shows how attackers can weaponize embarrassing data on Adult Streaming Site Breach. Your incident plans should cover: 5. Connect all of this back to CMMC and the holidays Tie these points into your CMMC story: This way, when a C3PAO or contracting officer asks “what happens if an analytics vendor is breached in December,” you have a clear answer. How Centrend supports CMMC holiday resiliency Centrend has been helping defense contractors line up their cybersecurity, CMMC requirements, and holiday season resilience so they are not caught flat-footed by an incident like this. Centrend can help your team: If you want a clear outside view before the next long weekend, Centrend can lead a focused Holiday Privacy and Ransomware Resilience Review and leave you with a practical action list you can start on right away.

Adult Streaming Site Breach: 200 Million Records Exposed Read More »

Centrend graphic showing NIST SP 800-171 Revision 3 vs CMMC certification in a modern IT office, highlighting updated security requirements, aligning with NIST, and new assessment procedures.

CMMC Level 2 vs NIST 800-171 Rev 3: Contractor Essentials

Cybersecurity /

CMMC Level 2. You keep hearing two messages at once: At the same time, the CMMC final rule is in place and showing up in real solicitations with award and assessment requirements for Level 2. No surprise that many defense contractors are asking a simple but urgent question: “Are we supposed to follow NIST 800-171 Rev 2 or Rev 3 for CMMC Level 2 right now?” If you guess wrong, you can end up with gaps in the version that assessors actually use, which can hurt both your SPRS score and your CMMC award eligibility. This post gives you a clear answer and a practical way forward. The confusion: two versions, one set of contracts Here is the situation in plain language: Recent articles aimed at defense contractors spell it out: So right away you can see the split: That is the source of the headache. What NIST 800-171 Rev 3 really changed NIST did not scrap Rev 2. It cleaned it up. Key points from NIST and expert explainers: DoD has also published Organization Defined Parameters (ODPs) for Rev 3 controls. These give concrete values for things like log retention, lockout thresholds, and other “tunable” settings in the new version. In other words, Rev 3 is the direction of travel for federal CUI protection, and DoD is already shaping how it will be used. But that still does not mean it is the CMMC Level 2 scoring baseline today. What CMMC Level 2 really checks today The CMMC final rule and most public mappings are still clear: Current guidance for contractors and MSPs still says: So if a C3PAO comes in to do a Level 2 assessment on a CMMC tagged contract: This is the part that “defense contractors must follow right now” for contract and award purposes. What defense contractors must follow right now Putting it together: So the practical answer: Right now, if you want to pass CMMC Level 2 and protect your DoD contract eligibility, you must be able to show a solid, evidence backed implementation of NIST 800-171 Rev 2 across your in scope systems. Rev 3 is “next”, not “instead of” Rev 2. How to use Rev 3 without breaking your CMMC audit You do not have to choose Rev 2 or Rev 3. The smart move is to use both in a controlled way. Step 1 – Lock in Rev 2 as your scored baseline This is the version that controls your SPRS score, DFARS 7012/7020/7021 posture, and CMMC assessment results today. Step 2 – Build a simple Rev 3 “overlay” instead of a rewrite For Rev 3: Then add a short overlay column to your internal tracking: This lets you prepare for the shift without throwing away the Rev 2 structure that CMMC Level 2 still uses. Step 3 – Use DoD’s ODP memo to tune settings, not to change your baseline DoD’s April 2025 memo sets Organization Defined Parameters for Rev 3. That gives you clear numbers for things like: You can borrow those values to sharpen your own settings even while your audit baseline is still Rev 2. This is a safe way to “future proof” your environment without stepping outside CMMC’s current scoring model. What this means for your next 12 months In the next year, most defense contractors will juggle three things at once: A simple way to talk about this with leadership: That is a very different message than “we have to start over for Rev 3.” Turning version confusion into a CMMC strength CMMC, NIST 800-171, and DFARS are not going to get simpler on their own. But this part can be clear: The contractors who stay ahead will be able to say: That is a strong, calm story to bring into both capture meetings and assessments. How Centrend can help your team right now Centrend can help defense contractors: If you want a focused working session, we can walk your team through a short Rev 2 vs Rev 3 CMMC Readiness Review and leave you with a practical action list for the next 90 days. Learn more about how Centrend’s Cybersecurity Services help defense contractors stay secure and CMMC ready.

CMMC Level 2 vs NIST 800-171 Rev 3: Contractor Essentials Read More »

CMMC holiday cybersecurity readiness graphic with a Christmas tree, data center, and two defense contractors reviewing a laptop.

CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness for Defense Contractors

Cybersecurity, IT Support, IT Tech Tips, Managed Services /

CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness. The holiday season is when your team slows down. Attackers see that as an open door. Government alerts and real incidents show the pattern: ransomware and major cyber events often hit on holidays and weekends, when staff is thin and response is slower. This year, that risk lines up with the CMMC final rule and new DFARS clauses showing up in real DoD awards. CMMC is now live in select contracts, and any gap can hit you twice: it hurts your eligibility and it increases the damage if an incident lands during a busy season. So the question is simple: if a serious cyber event hit on a holiday, would your CMMC story hold up under real pressure? This post gives you a clear way to test that before the next long weekend. Why holidays are a stress test for your CMMC program For most defense contractors, the holiday pattern looks like this: Threat actors know this. CISA and other groups have warned that attacks during holidays and weekends are often slower to detect, take longer to contain, and cause more damage.  From a CMMC view, this hits the same control families you already have to meet: These come straight from NIST SP 800-171, which CMMC Level 2 is built on. A holiday incident is not only about stopping the attack. It is also about whether your controls still work when people are out and whether you can prove that to an assessor or contracting officer later. The holiday risk that CMMC does not forgive CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness. Now layer in where CMMC is today. The final rule and the DFARS “clause rule” are in effect, with a phased rollout into new contracts. Key points that matter for the holidays: If that 180 day window runs through Thanksgiving, Christmas, New Year, and the usual vacation stretch, you cannot afford to “take a break” from your plan. The clock does not stop because your team is on holiday. A holiday lens on your CMMC controls Here is a simple way to look at your CMMC program through a holiday lens. Treat each section as a short talk with your IT, security, and contracts leads. 1. Who is watching when most people are out? Link to controls: Incident Response, Audit and Accountability Ask: CISA and many surveys show that even a small delay in seeing and handling a holiday attack can multiply the damage. Your holiday coverage plan should not live only in one person’s head. 2. Can people reach CUI systems safely from where they actually are? Link to controls: Access Control, Identification and Authentication, System and Communications Protection During holidays, people work from: Check: CMMC Level 2 expects you to manage who connects, from where, and how traffic is protected.  If your rules are strict on paper but ignored during busy periods, that gap will show. 3. If ransomware hit on a holiday, how would recovery really go? Link to controls: Contingency Planning, System and Information Integrity, Media Protection Ransomware during a holiday is one of the scariest cases. Government advisories highlight that many organizations take longer to respond and recover if the incident starts when key staff is away. Ask: CMMC and NIST 800-171 both expect working backup and recovery, not just a line in a plan.  4. Does your conditional status or POA&M plan survive the holiday calendar? If you are relying on Conditional CMMC Status for Level 2 or 3, your holiday planning is not just about risk. It is also about deadlines. By rule, conditional status: After that, you risk losing that status.  Holiday view: If the calendar looks tight, move work earlier in the season, not later. 5. Will your logs and evidence tell a clear story after the holidays? A holiday incident often becomes a test case. Assessors, primes, or the government may ask what happened, how you responded, and how your plan lined up with your policies and SSP. Tie this back to: Good questions: NIST 800-171 and CMMC Level 2 expect not only technical controls but also documentation and traceability. A short holiday CMMC readiness plan You do not need a huge project before the next break. Even a focused plan over a few weeks helps a lot in CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness. 1st Week Review and map 2nd Week Fix fast gaps 3rd Week Align evidence and status 4th Week Run a small holiday drill By the end of this short plan, you have something powerful: You can show that your CMMC program still works when staff is thin, when people are remote, and when attackers are most likely to try their luck. Turning holiday risk into a strength in your CMMC story CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness is not only about passing an audit. It is about showing that your team can protect FCI and CUI in real conditions, including during the busy, distracted, and under staffed weeks of the year.  Holiday cyber events are a harsh test. They stress: Defense contractors that will feel confident in the next wave of CMMC contracts will be able to say: How Centrend can help your team before the next holiday If you want help turning these ideas into action, Centrend can: A short working session now can save you from a long and painful incident later, and it gives you stronger evidence for your next CMMC assessment and DoD bid. Book Your CMMC Holiday Cyber Readiness Call Today

CMMC Holiday Cybersecurity Readiness for Defense Contractors Read More »

DFARS 252.204-7025: CMMC Award Eligibility Checklist

Cybersecurity, IT Support, IT Tech Tips /

DFARS 252.204-7025 is titled “Notice of Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification Level Requirements”. It is a solicitation provision, not a contract clause. It appears when the government adds DFARS 252.204-7021 to the resulting contract.In plain terms, 7025: If those items are not current and correct, the government cannot legally award the contract to you. Your CMMC award eligibility checklist for DFARS 252.204-7025 Use this checklist before you commit to a CMMC related bid. Treat it like a short pre-bid gate review. 1. Read the exact CMMC level in the solicitation In the 7025 provision, the contracting officer fills in one required level:  First step: confirm that your current or planned CMMC status actually matches that level for the systems you will use on this contract. Quick check 2. Map the bid to in scope systems, not just your company CMMC and 7025 do not care about your company in general. They care about the specific systems that will process, store, or transmit FCI or CUI for this contract.  For each bid: If you are a prime, include major subs that will handle CUI. DFARS 252.204-7021 and the final rule expect subcontractors to have their own status and entries in SPRS, even though you cannot see their scores directly.  3. Verify your CMMC status in SPRS Next, move from paper to the real system the government checks: SPRS. For each in scope system, confirm that: If you went through a third party assessment, confirm that the C3PAO completed the process and that the record shows as final, not just “in progress”. 4. Confirm your annual affirmation is up to date The rule introduces an “affirming official” who must make an annual affirmation in SPRS that you are meeting your CMMC requirements. The term replaces older “senior company official” language, but the intent is the same.  Ask three simple questions: If the affirmation is older than one year on the date of award or covers the wrong scope, your eligibility is at risk even if the CMMC status itself is still within the three year window.  5. Handle conditional CMMC status and POA&M deadlines Under the final rule, you can be awarded a contract based on a conditional CMMC status if certain gaps are documented in a POA&M. You then have 180 days to close those items and reach full status.  For each contract you are bidding: This is a good place to pull in lessons from your outage or drill work. If patch cycles, vendor upgrades, or network changes are slow during peak periods, plan those POA&M items earlier in the year. 6. Check your subs early Many contractors are surprised when a strong proposal fails because a critical subcontractor is not ready. For any sub that will process FCI or CUI for this contract:  You will not see their SPRS details, but you can still make “award readiness” part of your partner selection and capture process. 7. Align your story: SSP, boundary, and bid language DFARS 252.204-7025 is short, but it hooks into a larger story that includes your: Make sure the way you describe your environment and controls in the proposal matches what sits in SPRS and in your SSP. Misalignment here can lead to tense questions in negotiations or during later assessments. If you recently walked through outage drills, Cloudflare style resilience checks, or tabletop exercises, pull those notes into your evidence set. They support the idea that your security program is real, tested, and tied to your policies. A 30 day CMMC award readiness sprint If you want a simple path between now and your next CMMC related bid, use this short sprint. 1st Week: Get clear on your current state 2nd Week: Fix obvious blockers 3rd Week: Clean up SPRS and affirmations 4th Week: Bake eligibility checks into your capture process By the end of this sprint, your team can answer a simple but powerful question before every proposal: “If the contracting officer checked DFARS 252.204-7025 and SPRS right now, would we be clearly eligible for award” How Centrend can help your team move faster CMMC and DFARS 252.204-7025 are not just more paperwork. They are now part of the basic gate that decides who can win and who never makes it to evaluation. Centrend can help your team: If you want a quick outside view of where you stand, Centrend can lead a short DFARS 252.204-7025 Award Readiness Assesment Call so your next CMMC bid starts from a stronger position.

DFARS 252.204-7025: CMMC Award Eligibility Checklist Read More »

Cloudflare Downtime 2025, CMMC Thanksgiving Resilience Check illustration showing Centrend’s team at computers, a purple Thanksgiving turkey icon, and a glowing waveform to represent staying online during outages.

Cloudflare Downtime 2025, CMMC Thanksgiving Resilience Check

Cybersecurity, IT Support, IT Tech Tips /

Cloudflare Downtime 2025 showed how fast one bug can dim the internet. A bot-management config error rippled across Cloudflare’s edge and took major services including X and ChatGPT offline for hours. No attack, just a software failure that hit millions at once. In the very same month, the CMMC final rule took effect (November 10, 2025), kicking off a phased rollout across new DoD contracts. For many awards, a current Level 1 or 2 self-assessment or certification in SPRS is now checked at award. So just as contracts start scoring cyber readiness, a core internet provider reminded everyone how fragile “always on” really is. This Thanksgiving is a good moment to run a quiet resilience check and make sure you’re ready for both audits and outages. When a cloud hiccup becomes your problem If your team depends heavily on Cloudflare (or any single CDN, DNS, or security edge), an outage doesn’t just mean a slow website. It can mean: For contractors working under DFARS clauses and preparing for CMMC Level 2, availability and integrity aren’t just good practice, they tie directly into the NIST SP 800-171 control families behind Level 2 (access control, audit and accountability, incident response, contingency planning, and system integrity). If the internet blinks during the holiday rush, can you keep meeting those expectations on Cloudflare Downtime 2025? Thanksgiving Lens: What are you Thankful You Tested? Instead of only asking “what went wrong for Cloudflare,” this is a chance to ask: Those questions sit right at the intersection of Cloudflare downtime and CMMC resilience. A Combined Cloudflare + CMMC resilience checklist Since the Cloudflare Downtime 2025 use this as a Thanksgiving “table-top” conversation with your IT, security, and contracts teams. 1. Multi-CDN and DNS posture 2. CUI enclave and access 3. Evidence that matches your policies 4. SPRS and award readiness 5. Communication playbook A 30-day “Post-Cloudflare” plan You don’t need a huge project to make progress before year-end. 1st Week – Map and review 2nd Week – Tighten weak points 3rd Week – Run a small drill 4th Week – Fold it into CMMC By the end of the month, you haven’t just thought about Cloudflare’s outage you’ve turned it into proof that your own systems, people, and processes can adapt. How this ties back to your CMMC story CMMC isn’t only about stopping attackers. It’s about showing that your organization can keep DoD missions moving when any part of the stack misbehaves cloud, CDN, ISP, or identity provider. The Cloudflare downtime was one of those rare, public stress tests for the global internet. The contractors who will feel confident in 2026 and beyond will be the ones who can say, calmly and with evidence: Your Holiday Next Step If you’d like a second set of eyes on your Cloudflare (or other CDN/DNS) footprint and how it lines up with your CMMC roadmap, Centrend can walk your team through a short resilience review, map simple improvements, and help you turn this month’s outage into a practical win for next year’s audits and awards. Ready to turn this month’s outage lessons into a concrete plan? Book a short Cloudflare + CMMC resilience review with Centrend.

Cloudflare Downtime 2025, CMMC Thanksgiving Resilience Check Read More »

Scroll to Top